Which of the following best describes the impact of self-government in the Constitution?

The impact of self-government in the Constitution is best described by establishing a system of checks and balances. This framework was intentionally designed to ensure that no single branch of government—executive, legislative, or judicial—could operate without oversight or complete control over the others. By distributing power in this way, the Constitution fosters accountability and protects against abuses of power, illustrating the principle of self-government where the authority of the government is derived from the consent of the governed.

The checks and balances system also promotes public participation in governance, as it allows various branches to review and limit each other's powers, reflecting the needs and rights of the citizens. This arrangement ensures that the populace maintains a degree of influence over their government’s actions, embodying the essence of a democratic system where government decisions are made with public interest in mind.

In contrast, the other responses do not accurately capture the core principles associated with self-government in the Constitution. The empowerment of arbitrary decision-making, limitations on public participation, or the guarantee of absolute authority to leaders contradict the fundamental ideals outlined by the framers. The Constitution aims to create a government that is both representative and accountable to the people it serves.